| Amdahls Law |
Website Links For Law |
Information About ™Amdahls Law |
|
Amdahl's law, named after Computer architect Gene Amdahl , is used to find the maximum expected improvement to an overall system when only part of the system is improved. It is often used in Parallel Computing to predict the theoretical maximum Speedup using multiple processors. __TOC__ Amdahl's law can be interpreted more technically, but in simplest terms it means that it is the Algorithm that decides the speedup not the number of processors. You eventually reach a place where you can not parallelise the algorithm any more. Amdahl's law is a demonstration of the could possibly be is times faster. More technically, the law is concerned with the Speedup achievable from an improvement to a computation that affects a proportion ''P'' of that computation where the improvement has a speedup of ''S''. (For example, if an improvement can speedup 30% of the computation, ''P'' will be 0.3; if the improvement makes the portion affected twice as fast, ''S'' will be 2.) Amdahl's law states that the overall speedup of applying the improvement will be :. To see how this formula was derived, assume that the running time of the old computation was 1, for some unit of time. The running time of the new computation will be the length of time the unimproved fraction takes (which is 1 − ''P'') plus the length of time the improved fraction takes. The length of time for the improved part of the computation is the length of the improved part's former running time divided by the speedup, making the length of time of the improved part ''P''/''S''. The final speedup is computed by dividing the old running time by the new running time, which is what the above formula does. Here's another example. We are given a task which is split up into four parts: P1 = .11 or 11%, P2 = .18 or 18%, P3 = .23 or 23%, P4 = .48 or 48%, which add up to 100%. Then we say P1 is not sped up, so S1 = 1 or 100%, P2 is sped up 5x, so S2 = 5 or 500%, P3 is sped up 20x, so S3 = 20 or 2000%, and P4 is sped up 1.6x, so S4 = 1.6 or 160%. By using the formula , we find the running time is or a little less than 1/2 the original running time which we know is 1. Therefore the overall speed boost is or a little more than double the original speed using the formula . Notice how the 20x and 5x speedup don't have much effect on the overall speed boost and running time when over half of the task is only sped up 1x (i.e. not sped up) or 1.6x. PARALLELIZATION In the special case of parallelization, Amdahl's law states that if ''F'' is the fraction of a calculation that is sequential (i.e. cannot benefit from parallelisation), and (1 − ''F'') is the fraction that can be parallelised, then the maximum speedup that can be achieved by using ''N'' processors is :. In the limit, as ''N'' tends to Infinity , the maximum speedup tends to 1/''F''. In practice, price/performance ratio falls rapidly as ''N'' is increased once (1 − ''F'')/''N'' is small compared to ''F''. As an example, if ''F'' is only 10%, the problem can be sped up by only a maximum of a factor of 10, no matter how large the value of ''N'' used. For this reason, problems. A great part of the craft of Parallel Programming consists of attempting to reduce ''F'' to the smallest possible value. AMDAHL'S RULE OF THUMB Amdahl's Rule Of Thumb is that 1 byte of Memory and 1 byte per second of I/O are required for each Instruction per second supported by a Computer . REFERENCES
SEE ALSO EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|