| Political Corruption |
Article Index for Political |
Articles about Political Corruption |
Website Links For Political |
Information About ™Political Corruption |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT POLITICAL CORRUPTION | |
| political corruption | |
| political termspolitical corruption | |
| political terms | |
| corruption | |
| politics by issue | |
|
]] In broad terms, political corruption is the misuse of public (governmental) power for illegitimate, usually secret, private advantage. All forms of Government are susceptible to political corruption. Forms of corruption vary, but the most common are Patronage , Bribery , Extortion , Influence Peddling , Fraud , Embezzlement , and Nepotism . While corruption often facilitates criminal enterprise such as Drug Trafficking , Money Laundering , and criminal Prostitution , it is not restricted to these Organized Crime activities, and it does not always support or shield other crimes. What constitutes illegal corruption differs depending on the country or jurisdiction. Certain political funding practices that are legal in one place may be illegal in another. In some countries, Police and Prosecutors have broad discretion over who to arrest and charge, and the line between discretion and corruption can be difficult to draw, as in Racial Profiling . In countries with strong interest group politics, practices that could easily constitute corruption elsewhere are sometimes sanctified as official group preferences. EFFECTS Effects on politics, administration, and institutions Corruption poses a serious development challenge. In the political realm, it undermines democracy and good governance by flouting or even subverting formal processes. Corruption in Economic effects Corruption also undermines economic development by generating considerable distortions and inefficiency. In the Private Sector , corruption increases the cost of business through the price of illicit payments themselves, the management cost of negotiating with officials, and the risk of breached agreements or detection. Although some claim corruption reduces costs by cutting red tape, the availability of bribes can also induce officials to contrive new rules and delays. Where corruption inflates the cost of business, it also distorts the playing field, shielding firms with connections from competition and thereby sustaining inefficient firms. Corruption also generates economic distortions in the Public Sector by diverting public investment into capital projects where bribes and kickbacks are more plentiful. Officials may increase the technical complexity of public sector projects to conceal or pave way for such dealings, thus further distorting investment. Corruption also lowers compliance with construction, environmental, or other regulations, reduces the quality of government services and infrastructure, and increases budgetary pressures on government. Economists argue that one of the factors behind the differing .) In the case of Africa, one of the factors for this behaviour was political instability, and the fact that new governments often confiscated previous government's corruptly-obtained assets. This encouraged officials to stash their wealth abroad, out of reach of any future Expropriation . TYPES OF ABUSE Bribery: Bribe-takers and bribe-givers It takes two to create corruption: giving and taking bribes. In some countries the culture of corruption extends to every aspect of public life, making it extremely difficult to stay in business without resorting to bribes. Graft Graft is the act of a politician personally benefitting from public funds in a way other than prescribed by law. New York's Senator George Washington Plunkitt once famously claimed that there was a difference between "honest" and "dishonest" graft. The classical example of graft is a politician using his knowledge of zoning and decision making to purchase land which he knows his political organization is interested in developing on, and then selling it at a significant profit to that organization. Large gifts from parties within the government also qualify as graft, and most countries have laws against it. (For example, any gift over $200 value made to the President of the United States is considered to be a gift to the Office of the Presidency and not to the President himself. The outgoing President must buy it if he wants to take it with him.) Campaign Contributions and Soft Money In the political arena, it is difficult to prove corruption, but impossible to prove its absence. For this reason, there are often rumors about many politicians. Politicians are placed in apparently compromising positions because of their need to solicit financial contributions for their campaigns. Often, they then appear to be acting in the interests of those parties that fund them, giving rise to talk of political corruption. Supporters of politicians assert that it is entirely coincidental that many politicians appear to be acting in the interests of those who fund them. Cynics wonder why these organizations fund politicians at all, if they get nothing for their money. In the United States many companies, especially larger ones, fund both the Democratic and Republican parties. Because of the implications of corporations funding politicians, such as the perceived threat that these corporations are simply buying the votes of elected officials, certain countries, such as France , ban altogether the corporate funding of political parties. Because of the possible circumvention of this ban with respect to the funding of political campaigns, France also imposes maximum spending caps on campaigning; candidates that have exceeded those limits, or that have handed misleading accounting reports, risk having their candidacy ruled invalid, or even be prevented from running in future elections. In addition, the government funds political parties according to their successes in elections. In some countries, political parties are run solely off Subscription s (membership fees). Even legal measures such as these have been argued to be legalised corruption, in that they often favor the political status quo. Minor parties and independents often argue that efforts to rein in the influence of contributions do little more than protect the major parties with guaranteed public funding while constraining the possibility of private funding by outsiders. In these instances, officials are legally taking money from the public coffers for their election campaigns to guarantee that they will continue to hold their influenctial and often well-paid positions. CONDITIONS FAVORABLE FOR CORRUPTION Some argue that the following conditions are favorable for corruption:
Research shows that democracy, parliamentary systems, political stability, and freedom of the press are all associated with lower corruption. {Link without Title} MEASURING CORRUPTION Measuring corruption - in the (based on experts' opinions of how corrupt different countries are); a Global Corruption Barometer (based on a survey of general public attitudes toward and experience of corruption); and a Bribe Payers Survey, looking at the willingness of foreign firms to pay bribes. Transparency International also publishes the Global Corruption Report . The World Bank collects a range of data on corruption , including a set of Governance Indicators . Transparency International has performed perception surveys from time to time. The 10 least corrupt countries, according to one conducted in 2005, are (in alphabetical order): Australia , Austria , Denmark , Finland , Iceland , New Zealand , Norway , Singapore , Sweden , and Switzerland According to the same survey, the 9 most corrupt countries are (in alphabetical order): Angola , Bangladesh , Chad , Côte D'Ivoire , Equatorial Guinea , Haiti , Myanmar , Nigeria , and Turkmenistan However, the value of that survey is disputed, as it is based on subjective perceptions. Sophisticated technology may be available to those countries considered by the public as "least corrupt" to conceal corruption from public view or disguise it as legitimate dealings. According to the perception survey Mississippi, North Dakota and Louisiana are the three most corrupt states within the USA. New Hampshire, Oregon and Nebraska have the least amount of corruption. The largest states, California and Texas, are ranked in the middle, California ranking 25th and Texas in 29th. SEE ALSO Forms or aspects of corruption
Good governance Theoretical aspects Anti-corruption authorities and measures Examples of corruption
Corruption in fiction
REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
Official sites
Research
General
Maps |
|
|