Information About

Neo-gramscianism




The beginning of the neo-gramscian perspective can be traced to former ''Dinge an sich''.

However Cox disavows the label Neo-Gramscian despite the fact that in a follow-up article, he showed how Gramsci's thought can be used to analyze power structures within the GPE. Particularly Gramsci's concept of Hegemony , vastly different from the Realists' conception of hegemony, appears fruitful. Gramsci's state theory, his conception of "Historic Blocks" -- dominant configurations of (structural) abilities, ideologies and institutions as determining frames for individual and collective action -- and of élites acting as "organic intellectuals" forging Historic Blocks, is also deemed useful.

The Neo-Gramscian approach has also been developed along somewhat different lines by Cox's colleague, Stephen Gill , distinguished research professor of Political Science at York University in Toronto . Gill contributed to showing how the elite Trilateral Commission acted as an "organic intellectual", forging the (currently hegemonic) ideology of Neoliberalism and the so-called " Washington Consensus " and later in relation to the globalization of power and resistance in his book "Power and Resistance in the New World Order" (Palgrave 2003). Outside of North America, the so-called "Amsterdam School" around Kees Van Der Pijl And Henk Overbeek (at Free University Of Amsterdam ) and individual researchers in Germany , notably in Düsseldorf , Kassel and Marburg as well as at the University of Sussex in the UK, and other parts of the world, have adopted the neo-Gramscian critical method.


EXTERNAL LINKS