Leibniz Notation

Article Index for
Leibniz

Website Links For
Leibniz

Information About ^{^™}

Leibniz Notation

:

\lim_{\Delta x
ightarrow 0}rac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}

was the quotient of an infinitely small (i.e., Infinitesimal ) increment of ''y'' by an infinitely small increment of ''x''. Thus if

:

y=f(x) \!\

then

:

rac{dy}{dx}=f'(x)

It can clearly be seen that, in Leibniz's notation, the second derivative (using Implicit Differentiation ) is:
:

rac{d^2 y}{dx^2}=f''(x)

and has the units of

rac{y}{x^2}

. Note that

rac{d^2 y}{d x^2}

is saying

rac{d^2 y}{(dx)^2}

, or ''the second derivative of y over the square of the first derivative of x''. The denominator is not the derivative of x², nor is it the second derivative of x.

Similarly, although mathematicians may now view an integral as

:

\lim_{\Delta x
ightarrow 0}\sum_{i} f(x_i)\,\Delta x

Leibniz viewed it as the sum of infinitely many infinitely small quantities:

:

\int f(x)\,dx

HISTORY

In the 19th Century , mathematicians ceased to take Leibniz's notation for derivatives and integrals literally. That is, mathematicians saw that the concept of Infinitesimal s contained logical contradictions in the development. A number of 19th century mathematicians ( Cauchy , Weierstrass and others) found logically rigorous ways to treat derivatives and integrals without infinitesimals using limits as shown above. Nonetheless, Leibniz's notation is still in general use. Although the notation needs not be taken literally, it is usually simpler than alternatives when the technique of Separation Of Variables is used in the solution of differential equations. In physical applications, one may for example regard ''f''(''x'') as measured in meters per second, and ''dx'' in seconds, so that ''f''(''x'') ''dx'' is in meters, and so is the value of its definite integral. In that way the Leibniz notation is in harmony with Dimensional Analysis .

However, in the 1950s and 1960s , Abraham Robinson introduced ways of treating infinitesimals both literally and logically rigorously, and so rewriting calculus from that point of view. But Robinson's methods are not used by most mathematicians. (One mathematician, Jerome Keisler , has gone so far as to write a first-year-calculus textbook according to Robinson's point of view.)

SEE ALSO

Newton's Notation For Differentiation